View Source (Opens new Window)
Information Sources & Content are Subject to Change

BARR’S FAILURE REVEALED

OBVIOUS EVIDENCE A.G. BARR COVERED FOR HIS PRESIDENT

“The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President’s corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.”

The Mueller Report Contains 187 Pages Laying Out Evidence and Suggestions on How the Attorney General Should Have Pursued Charges of Obstruction of Justice Against Donald Trump. Deemed a “Virtual Road Map” of Legal Actions Attorney Gen. William Barr Failed to Act. His Public Statements Denying Ever Indicting a President, His Shamefully Innacurate Four Page Summary and His Surprise Press Conference Just Before the Report Went Public Shocked and Disappointed the American People

THE PEOPLE HE WAS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

BARR’S
FAILURE
REVEALED

OBVIOUS EVIDENCE A.G. BARR
COVERED FOR HIS PRESIDENT

“The conclusion that Congress may apply the obstruction laws to the President’s
corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system
of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.”

The Mueller Report Contains 187 Pages Laying Out Evidence and Suggestions on How the Attorney General Should Have Pursued Charges of Obstruction of Justice Against Donald Trump. Deemed a “Virtual Road Map” of Legal Actions Attorney Gen. William Barr Failed to Act. His Public Statements Denying Ever Indicting a President, His Shamefully Innacurate Four Page Summary and His Surprise Press Conference Just Before the Report Went Public Shocked and Disappointed the American People

THE PEOPLE HE WAS SUPPOSED TO REPRESENT WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Commentary:

You've got to give Trump credit where justified. HE SURE FOUND A GUY WHO WOULD PROVE A STATEMENT HE MADE DURING THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION:

"I Could Stand In the Middle Of Fifth Avenue And Shoot Somebody And I Wouldn't Lose Any Voters"

- Jan 2016 Campaign Rally Sioux City, Iowa

He's gone WAY WAY beyond that folks!

Corrupted our Country, Violated our Trust

Trump might as well have said:

"I Could Stand In the Middle Of the Republican Senate And Commit High Treason and Obstruction of Justice And I Wouldn't Lose Any REPUBLICAN Votes"

Trump supporters in the streets are repeating catch phrases direct from Trump's commode, his "tweet central".

"If Trump was guilty Mueller would have indicted him"

WRONG, Mueller's role was to investigate and deliver a report to his superior, and the Country.

"If Trump was guilty Barr would have indicted him"

REALLY? Have you read Barr's unsolicited memo on how he would never ever ever ever indict a President???

And my favorite revelation this past week. Listening to Trump supporting expert Attorney's on Trump supporting news channels going on about the Mueller Report having no proof of crimes... Haha, the first was within about 30 minutes of the report being public...

Let's break that down. These people spoke in "exact language" about a 448 page report that was released MINUTES before they appeared on TV?... wow Evelyn Wood Speed Reading geniuses!

Almost as good as Barr summarizing the report in 2 days. Then taking 4 weeks to black out the good parts!

I have not read the entire report. To be honest I get about 5 to 10 pages read and I'm glossing over with excitement and fear and dismay! I can only imagine the major news networks having teams of readers to find the highlights. But here are just a few examples of what Mueller’s report says about how Congress can Impeach a Sitting President:

“Under [the Office of Legal Counsel’s] analysis, Congress can permissibly criminalize certain obstructive conduct by the President, such as suborning perjury, intimidating witnesses, or fabricating evidence, because those prohibitions raise no separation-of-powers questions.”

“The separation-of-powers doctrine authorizes Congress to protect official proceedings, including those courts and grand juries, from corrupt, obstructive acts regardless of their source. We also concluded that any inroad on presidential authority that would occur from prohibiting corrupt acts does not undermine the President’s ability to fulfill his constitutional mission.”

“Finally, we concluded that in the rare case in which a criminal investigation of the President’s conduct is justified, inquiries to determine whether the President acted for a corrupt motive should not impermissibly chill his performance of his constitutionally assigned duties. The conclusion that Congress may apply obstruction laws to the President’s corrupt exercise of the powers of office accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.”

Pretty clear Barr paid his master back for the job.

GAMA!